Did the IME doctor's report just hurt your case?
Independent Medical Exam reports often use coded language to undermine a claim. Stop benefits. Lower your loss-of-use rating. Question your honesty. Answer 12 quick questions about what the IME doctor said and did, and find out which adversarial tactics are in your report.
Catches Common Tactics
Premature MMI, "no objective findings," symptom magnification, unjustified full-duty release, missing record review, lowballed SLU percentages.
Severity Score
Tells you whether what's in your report is routine, concerning, or actively damaging — and which flags need a counter-affidavit fast.
Translates IME Language
Plain-English explanations of why each phrase matters, what the carrier will use it for, and how it can be rebutted.
Counter-Strategy
What your treating doctor would need to say to neutralize each red flag, and what records to put in front of the WCLJ.
Who should use this
Anyone who's just received an IME report from the carrier's doctor — particularly if the carrier is now using that report to reduce or stop benefits, dispute permanency, or push for an early Section 32 settlement. Most useful within 30 days of the IME, while the medical record is still fresh.
A reality check
Most IME reports favor the carrier. That's the structural problem with how IMEs are scheduled and paid. Knowing what's in yours and why it's wrong is the first step in mounting a defense — not a guarantee of one.
This page last reviewed: